Webflow vs Framer
| Tested on | WebflowOur pick | FramerRunner-up |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Category | Visual builder | Visual builder |
| Hosting | SaaS | SaaS |
| Pricing from | $15/mo (Basic); Premium $25 | $5/mo (Mini), $10 Basic, $30 Pro |
| Free tier | Yes (free starter) | Yes (free tier) |
| API | CMS API (REST) | CMS API |
| Self-host | No | No |
| Best for | Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS | Fast design sites, landing pages, portfolios |
Our pick
Webflow takes it, scoring 8.5 on our scale. Read the full reasoning below, then decide against your own constraints.
Try Webflow →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Try Framer →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Webflow vs Framer
Webflow and Framer both get recommended a lot, but they suit different teams. Here's an honest, side-by-side look, no vendor spin.
How they differ
- Hosting: Webflow (SaaS); Framer (SaaS)
- Pricing from: Webflow ($15/mo (Basic); Premium $25); Framer ($5/mo (Mini), $10 Basic, $30 Pro)
- Free tier: Webflow (Yes (free starter)); Framer (Yes (free tier))
- API: Webflow (CMS API (REST)); Framer (CMS API)
- Self-host: Webflow (No); Framer (No)
- Best for: Webflow (Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS); Framer (Fast design sites, landing pages, portfolios)
- Our score: Webflow (8.5/10); Framer (8/10)
Our verdict
On our scoring, Webflow edges it (8.5/10 vs 8/10). The gold standard for design-led sites with a real CMS. Not truly headless, but for most sites that's fine, and it pays you well. That said, Framer is the better pick if its strengths (Fast design sites, landing pages, portfolios) match your needs.
Data last verified 2026-07-15. Prices and plans change, so always confirm on the vendor's site.
Try Webflow →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Try Framer →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.