Webflow vs Contentful
| Tested on | WebflowOur pick | ContentfulRunner-up |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Category | Visual builder | Headless CMS |
| Hosting | SaaS | SaaS |
| Pricing from | $15/mo (Basic); Premium $25 | $300/mo (Lite) |
| Free tier | Yes (free starter) | Yes (free tier) |
| API | CMS API (REST) | REST, GraphQL |
| Self-host | No | No |
| Best for | Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS | Enterprise content operations, large teams |
Our pick
Webflow takes it, scoring 8.5 on our scale. Read the full reasoning below, then decide against your own constraints.
Try Webflow →
Read the Contentful review →Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Webflow vs Contentful
Webflow and Contentful both get recommended a lot, but they suit different teams. Here's an honest, side-by-side look, no vendor spin.
How they differ
- Hosting: Webflow (SaaS); Contentful (SaaS)
- Pricing from: Webflow ($15/mo (Basic); Premium $25); Contentful ($300/mo (Lite))
- Free tier: Webflow (Yes (free starter)); Contentful (Yes (free tier))
- API: Webflow (CMS API (REST)); Contentful (REST, GraphQL)
- Self-host: Webflow (No); Contentful (No)
- Best for: Webflow (Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS); Contentful (Enterprise content operations, large teams)
- Our score: Webflow (8.5/10); Contentful (8/10)
Our verdict
On our scoring, Webflow edges it (8.5/10 vs 8/10). The gold standard for design-led sites with a real CMS. Not truly headless, but for most sites that's fine, and it pays you well. That said, Contentful is the better pick if its strengths (Enterprise content operations, large teams) match your needs.
Data last verified 2026-07-15. Prices and plans change, so always confirm on the vendor's site.
Try Webflow →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.