Squarespace vs Webflow
| Tested on | SquarespaceRunner-up | WebflowOur pick |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 7.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Category | Visual builder | Visual builder |
| Hosting | SaaS | SaaS |
| Pricing from | $16/mo (Personal); Core tier ~$17 | $15/mo (Basic); Premium $25 |
| Free tier | Trial only | Yes (free starter) |
| API | Limited API | CMS API (REST) |
| Self-host | No | No |
| Best for | Creatives, portfolios, small business, blogs | Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS |
Our pick
Webflow takes it, scoring 8.5 on our scale. Read the full reasoning below, then decide against your own constraints.
Try Squarespace →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Try Webflow →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Squarespace vs Webflow
Squarespace and Webflow both get recommended a lot, but they suit different teams. Here's an honest, side-by-side look, no vendor spin.
How they differ
- Hosting: Squarespace (SaaS); Webflow (SaaS)
- Pricing from: Squarespace ($16/mo (Personal); Core tier ~$17); Webflow ($15/mo (Basic); Premium $25)
- Free tier: Squarespace (Trial only); Webflow (Yes (free starter))
- API: Squarespace (Limited API); Webflow (CMS API (REST))
- Self-host: Squarespace (No); Webflow (No)
- Best for: Squarespace (Creatives, portfolios, small business, blogs); Webflow (Designers, marketing teams, no-code sites with a CMS)
- Our score: Squarespace (7.5/10); Webflow (8.5/10)
Our verdict
On our scoring, Webflow edges it (8.5/10 vs 7.5/10). The gold standard for design-led sites with a real CMS. Not truly headless, but for most sites that's fine, and it pays you well. That said, Squarespace is the better pick if its strengths (Creatives, portfolios, small business, blogs) match your needs.
Data last verified 2026-07-15. Prices and plans change, so always confirm on the vendor's site.
Try Webflow →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Try Squarespace →
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.